Opinion · Nylaw New York

TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD v. STRATTON, 234 App. Div. 885 (1931)

TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. STRATTON & Others, as Membersof the Vill. Bd. of the Inc. Vill. of Malverne, Appellants., 234 A.D. 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1931)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1931-01-01
Topic: general

TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD v. STRATTON, 234 App. Div. 885 (1931) TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. STRATTON and Others, as Membersof the Village Board of the Incorporated Village of Malverne, Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD v. STRATTON, 234 App. Div. 885 (1931). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD v. STRATTON,234 App. Div. 885(1931)

TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. STRATTON and Others, as Members

of the Village Board of the Incorporated Village of Malverne, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

December, 1931.

Order of the County Court of Nassau county granting plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ.