Opinion · Nylaw New York

TJEPKEMA v. KENNEY, 24 N.Y.2d 942 (1969)

DOROTHY TJEPKEMA, as Adm’r, Adm’x of the Est. of HOWARD TJEPKEMA,Deceased, Respondent, v. KARL R. KENNEY, Appellant., 24 N.Y.2d 942 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1969)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1969-01-01
Topic: general

TJEPKEMA v. KENNEY, 24 N.Y.2d 942 (1969) DOROTHY TJEPKEMA, as Administratrix of the Estate of HOWARD TJEPKEMA,Deceased, Respondent, v. KARL R. KENNEY, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted May 5, 1969 Decided May 14, 1969 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, SIDNEY A. FINE, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed TJEPKEMA v. KENNEY, 24 N.Y.2d 942 (1969). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TJEPKEMAv.KENNEY,24 N.Y.2d 942(1969)

DOROTHY TJEPKEMA, as Administratrix of the Estate of HOWARD TJEPKEMA,

Deceased, Respondent,v.KARL R. KENNEY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted May 5, 1969

Decided May 14, 1969

Page 943

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, SIDNEY A. FINE, J.

Reid A. Curtisfor motion.Melvin W. KnyperandHoward Schaerfopposed.

Motion dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.