Opinion · Alabama Court Opinions

TEEPLE v. STATE, 54 Ala. App. 357 (1975)

Alice TEEPLE v. STATE., 308 So. 2d 717 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. 1975)

Type
Opinion
Court
Alabama Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Alabama
Date
1975-02-18
Topic
general

TEEPLE v. STATE, 54 Ala. App. 357 (1975) 308 So.2d 717 Alice TEEPLE v. STATE. 3 Div. 312.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. February 18, 1975.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed TEEPLE v. STATE, 54 Ala. App. 357 (1975). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TEEPLE v. STATE,54 Ala. App. 357(1975)
308 So.2d 717
Alice TEEPLE v. STATE.
3 Div. 312.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
February 18, 1975.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lowndes County, Arthur E. Gamble, J.
Alston Keith, Jr., Selma, for appellant.

Failure of the trial judge to make inquiry as to time defendant served on former conviction and failure to go into prior time shown by records was error requiring remandment for proper sentence. Code of Alabama, Title 15, Section 389; Goolsby v. State,44 Ala. App. 535,215 So.2d 598, modified283 Ala. 269,215 So.2d 662. The defendant is entitled to credit for time served on a prior sentence if he is subsequently retried and convicted. Without such credit the defendant would be serving time beyond the maximum fixed by law for the offense. Such excessive punishment would be in violation of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Goolsby v. State,44 Ala. App. 535,215 So.2d 598, supra; modified283 Ala. 269,215 So.2d 662, supra.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Randolph P. Reaves, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.

Time spent in the county jail either before or after conviction does not count on a term in the penitentiary. Ex parte Cofield,42 Ala. App. 344,164 So.2d 716.
BOOKOUT, Judge.
Appellant was indicted on a charge of first degree murder on April 2, 1974, and was found guilty by the Jury of first degree manslaughter and sentenced to ten years in the penitentiary. After appellant's arrest, she was confined in the Lowndes County Jail from October 27, 1973, until the date of her trial April 22, 1974. Appellant's bond was set originally at $25,000.00 and on motion of defense counsel, the trial judge reduced it to $10,000.00.Page 358

The homicide occurred at the Jack and Jill, a Lowndes County grocery and drinking establishment. The appellant, Alice Teeple, had been dating the deceased, Joe Green, for some time. They had known each other since they were children. On Friday afternoon, October 26, 1973, Miss Teeple and Joe Green began drinking gin and whiskey in Dothan. They drove to the home of the appellant's mother in Greenville and then on to Lowndes County to the Jack and Jill where they consumed more alcoholic beverages. After arriving at the bar around 11:00 P.M., the deceased entered into an altercation with a Mr. Fussel which ended abruptly when Green hit Fussel in the back of the head with a gun. Fussel left the premises and Green continued to drink heavily.

The testimony indicated that Green customarily carried a pistol, under the seat of his car while driving, in his pants when not driving, and under his pillow when he slept. Green had also served time in the Alabama penitentiary for second degree burglary.

Witnesses testified that around 1:00-1:30 A.M., Green stated that he had had too much to drink and went into the back bedroom of the premises to rest before driving home. While he was asleep, appellant began searching for him around the premises. She found him lying on the floor of the bedroom wrapped in a bedspread and began asking him to take her home.

There were no witnesses to the shooting except appellant. She stated that Green reached under the bed pillow and stuck his pistol in her face ordering her to leave him alone. He then pulled back the hammer on the pistol pushing it further into her face. She testified that she pushed the gun away from her, and it discharged wounding Green fatally. Appellant's plea of not guilty and her defense in the case was based solely upon self-defense.
I
Appellant's only assignments of error relate to sentencing. Appellant contends that the trial court should have given her credit for the six months spent in County Jail prior to her trial and sentencing. Appellant contends that since the maximum sentence allowed by law for her offense is ten years, which the trial judge assessed, she was actually sentenced to ten years and six months counting the time she had already spent in jail which amounts to a denial of her constitutional rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
II
Appellant contends that excessive bail was set in contravention of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. That point was raised by appellant's motion to have bond reduced, and the court reduced her bond from $25,000.00 to $10,000.00. Excessive bail was not set out as a ground in appellant's motion for a new trial and, therefore, is not a question before this Court.
III
The State relies on the case of Ex parte Cofield,42 Ala. App. 344,164 So.2d 716. The opinion of this Court written by Judge Cates in that case held that time spent in county jail either before or after conviction does not count on a term in the penitentiary.

This Court citedCofieldand Ryan v. State,100 Ala. 105,14 So. 766, as authority on the identical point raised in the case of Robinson v. State,47 Ala. App. 51,249 So.2d 872, in an opinion prepared by W. J. Haralson, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, and adopted by this Court.

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur.Page 359