Opinion · Nylaw New York

TAUZIEDE v. JUMEL, 133 N.Y. 614 (1892)

JEAN ALBERT TAUZIEDE et al., Appellants, v. FRANCOIS HENRY JUMEL et al.,Respondents., 30 N.E. 1000 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1892)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1892-01-01
Topic: general

TAUZIEDE v. JUMEL, 133 N.Y. 614 (1892) 30 N.E. 1000 JEAN ALBERT TAUZIEDE et al., Appellants, v. FRANCOIS HENRY JUMEL et al.,Respondents.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 22, 1892 Decided May 3, 1892 John J. Macklin for appellants. Edward Winslow Paige for respondents.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed TAUZIEDE v. JUMEL, 133 N.Y. 614 (1892). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TAUZIEDEv. JUMEL,133 N.Y. 614(1892)

30 N.E. 1000

JEAN ALBERT TAUZIEDE et al., Appellants,v. FRANCOIS HENRY JUMEL et al.,

Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 22, 1892

Decided May 3, 1892

Page 615

John J. Macklinfor appellants.Edward Winslow Paigefor respondents.Page 616

EARL, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.