Opinion · Nylaw New York

STRAHAN v. KRAUSE, 235 App. Div. 612 (1932)

ANNA FREDERICA STRAHAN, as Ex’[r, x], etc., of GEORGE v. STRAHAN,Respondent, v. ARTHUR R. KRAUSE, Defendant, Impleaded with FREDERICK W.MATHIEU & GRACE MATHIEU, Appellants., 235 A.D. 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1932-01-01
Topic: general

STRAHAN v. KRAUSE, 235 App. Div. 612 (1932) ANNA FREDERICA STRAHAN, as Executrix, etc., of GEORGE V. STRAHAN,Respondent, v. ARTHUR R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STRAHAN v. KRAUSE, 235 App. Div. 612 (1932). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STRAHAN v. KRAUSE,235 App. Div. 612(1932)

ANNA FREDERICA STRAHAN, as Executrix, etc., of GEORGE V. STRAHAN,

Respondent, v. ARTHUR R. KRAUSE, Defendant, Impleaded with FREDERICK W.

MATHIEU and GRACE MATHIEU, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

January, 1932.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, O'Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.