Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. VELEZ, 213 Conn. 809 (1989)
STATE OF Conn. v. GEORGE VELEZ, 568 A.2d 794 (Conn. 1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1989-01-01
- Topic
- general
STATE v. VELEZ, 213 Conn. 809 (1989) 568 A.2d 794 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GEORGE VELEZSupreme Court of Connecticut The state of Connecticut's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,20 Conn. App. 168, is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the police had an insufficient basis for relying upon the information furnished by the informant and, therefore lacked probable cause for the arrest and subsequent search of the defendant?" Timothy J. Sugrue, deputy assistant state's attorney in support of the petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. VELEZ, 213 Conn. 809 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the police had an insufficient basis for relying upon the information furnished by the informant and, therefore lacked probable cause for the arrest and subsequent search of the defendant?"
Timothy J. Sugrue, deputy assistant state's attorney in support of the petition.
Brian J. Kornbrath, in opposition.