Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
STATE v. VANDERSLICE, 77 Wn. App. 1017 (1995)
STATE OF Wash., Respondent, v. ROY WILLIAM VANDERSLICE,Appellant.In the Matter of the Pers. Restraint of ROY WILLIAM VANDERSLICE,Petitioner., 77 Wash. App. 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1995-03-10
- Topic
- general
STATE v. VANDERSLICE, 77 Wn. App. 1017 (1995) THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROY WILLIAM VANDERSLICE,Appellant.In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of ROY WILLIAM VANDERSLICE,Petitioner. Nos. 16461-2-II; 17621-1-II.The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. VANDERSLICE, 77 Wn. App. 1017 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. VANDERSLICE,77 Wn. App. 1017(1995)
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,Respondent,v. ROY WILLIAM VANDERSLICE,
Appellant.
In the Matter of the Personal Restraint ofROY WILLIAM VANDERSLICE,
Petitioner.
Nos. 16461-2-II; 17621-1-II.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
March 10, 1995.
UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skamania County, No. 91-1-00075-0, Ted Kolbaba, J., entered September 17, 1992, together with a petition for personal restraint. Judgment
affirmedand petitiondismissedby unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Seinfeld, C.J., and Houghton, J.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩