Opinion · Fllaw Florida

STATE v. THOMPSON, 401 So.2d 1340 (Fla. 1981)

401 So.2d 1340

Type
Opinion
Court
Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction
Fllaw
Date
1981-07-30
Topic
general

STATE v. THOMPSON, 401 So.2d 1340 (Fla. 1981) STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. WILBERT THOMPSON, RESPONDENT. No. 59599.Supreme Court of Florida. July 30, 1981.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. THOMPSON, 401 So.2d 1340 (Fla. 1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. THOMPSON,401 So.2d 1340(Fla. 1981)
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. WILBERT THOMPSON, RESPONDENT.
No. 59599.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 30, 1981.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lawrence J. Stein, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
On January 14, 1981, this Court entered its order accepting jurisdiction and dispensing with oral argument. We have now determined that the Court is without jurisdiction, and therefore the Petition for Review is denied.386 So.2d 264.

No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.