Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. SMITH, 5 Or. App. 578 (1971)

STATE OF Or., Respondent, v. MICHAEL WEBB SMITH, Appellant., 484 P.2d 1128 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)

Type: Opinion
Court: Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction: Orlaw
Date: 1971-01-01
Topic: general

STATE v. SMITH, 5 Or. App. 578 (1971) 484 P.2d 1128, 490 P.2d 1262 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL WEBB SMITH, Appellant.Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued May 19, 1971 Affirmed from bench May 19, 1971Petition for rehearing denied June 15, 1971Petition for review allowed August 10, 1971See later volume Oregon Reports Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. JAMES M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. SMITH, 5 Or. App. 578 (1971). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. SMITH,5 Or. App. 578(1971)

484 P.2d 1128,490 P.2d 1262

STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. MICHAEL WEBB SMITH,Appellant.

Oregon Court of Appeals.

Argued May 19, 1971

Affirmed from bench May 19, 1971

Petition for rehearing denied June 15, 1971

Petition for review allowed August 10, 1971

See later volume Oregon Reports

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

JAMES M. BURNS, Judge.

Howard R. Lonergan,Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.Walter L. Barrie,Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FOLEY, Judges.

AFFIRMED FROM THE BENCH.Page 579