Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

STATE v. ROWE, 81 N.J. 296 (1878)

406 A.2d 169

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1978-02-03
Topic: general

STATE v. ROWE, 81 N.J. 296 (1878) 406 A.2d 169 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD J. ROWE,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued November 1, 1977 — Decided February 3, 1978. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. ROWE, 81 N.J. 296 (1878). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. ROWE,81 N.J. 296(1878)

406 A.2d 169

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD J. ROWE,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 1, 1977 —

Decided February 3, 1978.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. James Irving Peck, IV, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).Ms. Ileana N. Saros, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.For affirmance— Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 6.For reversed— None.Page 297