Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

STATE v. ROSENBERG, 20 N.J. 303 (1956)

STATE OF N.J., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL ROSENBERG,DEFENDANT-PETITIONER., 119 A.2d 789 (N.J. 1956)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1956-01-09
Topic: general

STATE v. ROSENBERG, 20 N.J. 303 (1956) 119 A.2d 789 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL ROSENBERG,DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 9, 1956. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. ROSENBERG, 20 N.J. 303 (1956). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. ROSENBERG,20 N.J. 303(1956)

119 A.2d 789

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL ROSENBERG,

DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

January 9, 1956.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Messrs. Saltzman, Rubenstein Kosofffor the petitioner.Mr. Ralph L. Fusco, Mr. Julius A. FeinbergandMr. Joseph P.Lordifor the respondent.

Denied.