Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. ROBERTSON, 9 Or. App. 84 (1972)

STATE OF Or., Respondent, v. DENNIS ROBERTSON, Appellant., 494 P.2d 900 (Or. Ct. App. 1972)

Type: Opinion
Court: Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction: Orlaw
Date: 1972-05-31
Topic: general

STATE v. ROBERTSON, 9 Or. App. 84 (1972) 494 P.2d 900 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DENNIS ROBERTSON, Appellant. No. 71-145 COregon Court of Appeals.Argued March 28, 1972 Affirmed March 28, 1972Petition for rehearing denied April 18, 1972Petition for review denied May 31, 1972 Appeal from Circuit Court, Klamath County, DONALD A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. ROBERTSON, 9 Or. App. 84 (1972). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. ROBERTSON,9 Or. App. 84(1972)

494 P.2d 900

STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. DENNIS ROBERTSON,Appellant.

No. 71-145 C

Oregon Court of Appeals.

Argued March 28, 1972

Affirmed March 28, 1972

Petition for rehearing denied April 18, 1972

Petition for review denied May 31, 1972

Appeal from Circuit Court, Klamath County, DONALD A. W. PIPER, Judge.

J. Marvin Kuhn,Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.John H. Clough,Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and John W. Osburn, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and FOLEY and FORT, Judges.

AFFIRMED FROM THE BENCH.Page 85