Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. LEO F. RITROVATO, 272 Conn. 905 (2004)

STATE OF Conn. v. LEO F. RITROVATO., 863 A.2d 699 (Conn. 2004)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2004-12-08
Topic: general

STATE v. LEO F. RITROVATO, 272 Conn. 905 (2004) 863 A.2d 699 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LEO F. RITROVATO.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. LEO F. RITROVATO, 272 Conn. 905 (2004). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. LEO F. RITROVATO,272 Conn. 905(2004)

863 A.2d 699

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LEO F. RITROVATO.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,85 Conn. App. 575(AC 23189), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) the trial court did not improperly preclude the defendant's evidence regarding the victim's prior sexual conduct; and (2) the prosecutorial misconduct did not violate the defendant's right to a fair trial?"

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17323.

G. Douglas Nash, special public defender, in support of the petition.Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided December 8, 2004.

Page 906