Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. JOSE G., 284 Conn. 916 (2007)

STATE OF Conn. v. JOSE G., 931 A.2d 937 (Conn. 2007)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2007-01-01
Topic: general

STATE v. JOSE G., 284 Conn. 916 (2007) 931 A.2d 937 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSE G.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn. App. 748 (AC 24785), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant's claim about the erroneous admission of extrinsic testimony to establish statements by the victim?" Daniel J. Krisch, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. JOSE G., 284 Conn. 916 (2007). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. JOSE G.,284 Conn. 916(2007)

931 A.2d 937

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSE G.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,102 Conn. App. 748(AC 24785), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant's claim about the erroneous admission of extrinsic testimony to establish statements by the victim?"

Daniel J. Krisch, special public defender, in support of the petition.Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

VERTEFEUILLE and SCHALLER, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Decided September 21, 2007

Page 917