Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. HAZEEM, 55 Or. App. 273 (1981)

STATE OF Or., Respondent, v. FREDERICK EDWARD HAZEEM, Appellant., 637 P.2d 938 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

Type: Opinion
Court: Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction: Orlaw
Date: 1981-12-21
Topic: general

STATE v. HAZEEM, 55 Or. App. 273 (1981) 637 P.2d 938 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FREDERICK EDWARD HAZEEM, Appellant. Nos.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. HAZEEM, 55 Or. App. 273 (1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. HAZEEM,55 Or. App. 273(1981)

637 P.2d 938

STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. FREDERICK EDWARD HAZEEM,Appellant.

Nos. C79-09-33039, C79-09-33098, C79-08-32938, CA 17762

Oregon Court of Appeals.

Argued July 27, 1981.

December 21, 1981.

Petition for review denied February 24, 1982.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, John C. Beatty, Jr., Judge.

Richard S. Mannis, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Stephen F. Peifer, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.Page 274

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in fixing the amount of restitution. We find no error.State v. Boswell,52 Or. App. 535,628 P.2d 763,rev den291 Or. 419(1981).

Defendant's second and third assignments of error were not asserted nor excepted to at trial. Therefore, we decline to consider those assignments.State v. Coria,39 Or. App. 507,592 P.2d 1057,rev den286 Or. 449(1979);State v. Newberry,39 Or. App. 119,591 P.2d 404,rev den286 Or. 449(1979);State v.Gaines,27 Or. App. 69,555 P.2d 469(1976),rev den277 Or. 1,cert denied,431 U.S. 916,97 S Ct 2179,53 L Ed 2d 227(1977).

Affirmed.Page 275