Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
STATE v. DAGRACA, 136 Wn. App. 1009 (2006)
STATE OF Wash., Respondent, v. JUSTIN D. DAGRACA, Appellant., 136 Wash. App. 1009 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 2006-11-28
- Topic
- general
STATE v. DAGRACA, 136 Wn. App. 1009 (2006) THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JUSTIN D. DAGRACA, Appellant.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. DAGRACA, 136 Wn. App. 1009 (2006). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. DAGRACA,136 Wn. App. 1009(2006)
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JUSTIN D. DAGRACA, Appellant.
No. 34320-7-II.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
November 28, 2006.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 05-8-02048-0, Frederick B. Hayes, J. Pro Tem., entered December 15, 2005.
Reversedandremandedby unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
Counsel for Appellant(s), Carol A Elewski, Attorney at Law, Tumwater, WA.
Counsel for Respondent(s), Alicia Marie Burton, Pierce County Prosecutors Office, Tacoma, WA.
Counsel for Respondent(s), Alicia Marie Burton, Pierce County Prosecutors Office, Tacoma, WA.
BRIDGEWATER and ARMSTRONG, JJ., concur.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩