Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. CORBIN, 256 Conn. 910 (2001)

772 A.2d 1124

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2001-05-02
Topic: general

STATE v. CORBIN, 256 Conn. 910 (2001) 772 A.2d 1124 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PATRICK CORBINSupreme Court of Connecticut The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 496 (AC 20436), is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim's statement regarding fellatio on the defendant by the victim was not admissible under State v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. CORBIN, 256 Conn. 910 (2001). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. CORBIN,256 Conn. 910(2001)

772 A.2d 1124

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PATRICK CORBIN

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,61 Conn. App. 496(AC 20436), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim's statement regarding fellatio on the defendant by the victim was not admissible under State v. Whelan,200 Conn. 743,513 A.2d 86, cert. denied,479 U.S. 994,107 S.Ct. 597,93 L.Ed.2d 589(1986)?"

"2. If the answer to question one is `yes,' was the error harmless?"

"3. Even if the answer to question two is `no,' did the Appellate Court properly order that a judgment of acquittal be rendered on that count of sexual assault in the first degree?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16517.Christopher T. Godialis, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.Page 911James B. Streeto, deputy assistant public defender, in opposition.

Decided May 2, 2001