Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

STATE v. CONERLY, 342 So.2d 671 (La. 1977)

342 So.2d 671

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1977-02-28
Topic: general

STATE v. CONERLY, 342 So.2d 671 (La. 1977) STATE OF LOUISIANA v. MURRILL CONERLY. No. 59378.Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 28, 1977.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. CONERLY, 342 So.2d 671 (La. 1977). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. CONERLY,342 So.2d 671(La. 1977)

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. MURRILL CONERLY.

No. 59378.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 28, 1977.

IN RE: MURRILL CONERLY, APPLYING FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI, REVIEW, PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS AND STAY ORDER.

[1] Writ denied. The ruling of the trial judge is correct.

[2] TATE, DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., concur, believing the issue is not posed until after the witnesses testify on direct for the state, if the defendant is then denied access to the grand-jury testimony of these witnesses for purposes of cross-examination, a substantial confrontation right may be denied him. SeeDavisv. Alaska,415 U.S. 308, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974).West Page 672