Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. BOUNDY, 317 Or. 579 (1993)

STATE OF Or., Respondent on Rev., v. ORAPUN BOUNDY, Petitioner onReview., 858 P.2d 448 (Or. 1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1993-09-23
Topic
general

STATE v. BOUNDY, 317 Or. 579 (1993) 858 P.2d 448 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. ORAPUN BOUNDY, Petitioner onReview. CC CM 90-0427; CA A68946; SC S39884Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted August 30, 1993 Dismissed September 23, 1993 In Banc On review from the Court of Appeals.[fn*] [fn*] Appeal from Benton County Circuit Court, Robert S. Gardner, Judge. 115 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. BOUNDY, 317 Or. 579 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. BOUNDY,317 Or. 579(1993)
858 P.2d 448
STATE OF OREGON,Respondent on Review,v. ORAPUN BOUNDY,Petitioner on
Review.
CC CM 90-0427; CA A68946; SC S39884
Oregon Supreme Court.
Argued and submitted August 30, 1993
Dismissed September 23, 1993
In Banc
On review from the Court of Appeals.fn*
Jad Lemhouse, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the petitions for petitioner on review.

Brenda J Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Laura Graser, Portland, filed a brief in behalf ofamicuscuriaeOregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.Page 580
  1. Appeal from Benton County Circuit Court, Robert S. Gardner, Judge.115 Or. App. 638,840 P.2d 1307(1992). ↩