Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. WHITLEY, 584 So.2d 1144 (La. 1991)

STATE EX REL. WALLACE McDONALD v. JOHN P. WHITLEY, WARDEN, LOUISIANASTATE PENITENTIARY., 584 So. 2d 1144 (La. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Louisiana
Date
1991-09-17
Topic
general

STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. WHITLEY, 584 So.2d 1144 (La. 1991) STATE EX REL. WALLACE McDONALD v. JOHN P.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. WHITLEY, 584 So.2d 1144 (La. 1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. WHITLEY,584 So.2d 1144(La. 1991)
STATE EX REL. WALLACE McDONALD v. JOHN P. WHITLEY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA
STATE PENITENTIARY.
No. 91-KH-2099.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
September 17, 1991.
In re McDonald, Wallace; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. "I", No. 88,704.
[1] The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on May 16, 1991. If relator's representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator's representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is here with transferred to the district court.