Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. RODRIGUEZ, 58 Or. App. 531 (1982)

In the Matter of Rita Melissa Rodriguez, a Child.STATE ex rel JUVENILE Dep’t OF GRANT COUNTY, Respondent, v. RODRIGUEZ,Appellant., 648 P.2d 1360 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1982-01-01
Topic
general

STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. RODRIGUEZ, 58 Or. App. 531 (1982) 648 P.2d 1360 In the Matter of Rita Melissa Rodriguez, a Child.STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF GRANT COUNTY, Respondent, v. RODRIGUEZ,Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. RODRIGUEZ, 58 Or. App. 531 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. RODRIGUEZ,58 Or. App. 531(1982)
648 P.2d 1360
In the Matter of Rita Melissa Rodriguez, a Child.
STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF GRANT COUNTY,Respondent,v. RODRIGUEZ,
Appellant.
No. 1232 1238 CA A21863
Oregon Court of Appeals.
On appellant's reconsideration filed April 12, 1982.
Former opinion filed March 15 (56 Or. App. 592, 643 P.2d 424) adhered to
August 11, 1982.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Grant County, Walter I. Edmonds, Jr., Judge.
Mike Kilpatrick, and Kilpatricks Pope, Mt. Vernon, for petition.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Daryl Dodson Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, contra.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Petition for reconsideration allowed. Former opinion adhered to.Page 532
PER CURIAM.
Appellant petitions for reconsideration of our decision affirming the termination of his parental rights.State ex relJuv. Dept. v. Rodriguez,56 Or. App. 592,643 P.2d 424(1982). He contends the state did not prove the allegations by clear and convincing evidence as required bySantosky v. Kramer,455 U.S. 745,102 S Ct 1388,71 L Ed 2d 599(1982). The petition for reconsideration is granted. We have reexamined the record in light ofState ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Farrell,55 Or. App. 897,640 P.2d 652,rem'd292 Or. 822,modified58 Or. App. 258,648 P.2d 401(1982), and adhere to our prior decision.Page 533