Opinion · Nylaw New York

SMITH v. MEADE, 256 App. Div. 959 (1939)

MARY E. SMITH, Appellant, v. ELEN MEADE, Also Known as HELEN C. MEADE, AlsoKnown as HELEN M. SMITH, as Ex’[r, x], etc., of GEORGE EDMUND SMITH, AlsoKnown as GEORGE ED. SMITH, Deceased, Respondent., 256 A.D. 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1939-02-28
Topic: general

SMITH v. MEADE, 256 App. Div. 959 (1939) MARY E. SMITH, Appellant, v. ELEN MEADE, Also Known as HELEN C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SMITH v. MEADE, 256 App. Div. 959 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SMITH v. MEADE,256 App. Div. 959(1939)

MARY E. SMITH, Appellant, v. ELEN MEADE, Also Known as HELEN C. MEADE, Also

Known as HELEN M. SMITH, as Executrix, etc., of GEORGE EDMUND SMITH, Also

Known as GEORGE ED. SMITH, Deceased, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

February 28, 1939.

Appeal, nominally by plaintiff but in fact by her executor, from an order vacating an order continuing in the name of the executor an action brought to recover damages for alleged fraud and other tortious conduct. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.