Opinion · Nylaw New York

SIMSON v. BANK OF COMMERCE IN BUFFALO, 120 N.Y. 623 (1890)

JOHN SIMSON, Appellant, v. BANK OF COMMERCE IN BUFFALO, Impleaded, etc.,Respondent., 120 N.Y. 623 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1890)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1890-03-21
Topic: general

SIMSON v. BANK OF COMMERCE IN BUFFALO, 120 N.Y. 623 (1890) JOHN SIMSON, Appellant, v. BANK OF COMMERCE IN BUFFALO, Impleaded, etc.,Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued March 6, 1890 Decided March 21, 1890 B.S. Farrington for appellant. George Clinton for respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SIMSON v. BANK OF COMMERCE IN BUFFALO, 120 N.Y. 623 (1890). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SIMSONv. BANK OF COMMERCE IN BUFFALO,120 N.Y. 623(1890)

JOHN SIMSON, Appellant,v. BANK OF COMMERCE IN BUFFALO, Impleaded, etc.,

Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued March 6, 1890

Decided March 21, 1890

B.S. Farringtonfor appellant.George Clintonfor respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except BRADLEY and HAIGHT, JJ., not sitting.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute against plaintiff on stipulation.Page 624