Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

SCHWENGER-KLEIN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 103 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1939)

SCHWENGER-KLEIN, Inc., Petitioner, v. Comm’r OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent., 103 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1939-05-09
Topic: general

SCHWENGER-KLEIN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 103 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1939) SCHWENGER-KLEIN, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent. No. 7861.Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCHWENGER-KLEIN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 103 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCHWENGER-KLEIN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE,103 F.2d 1019(6th Cir. 1939)

SCHWENGER-KLEIN, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

No. 7861.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 9, 1939.

Appeal from United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Miller, Daus Schwenger, of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

James W. Morris, J.P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, Frederick R. Shearer, J. Louis Monarch, and John J. Pringle, Jr., all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before ALLEN, HAMILTON, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision is affirmed for the reasons given in the memorandum opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals.Page 1021