Opinion · Nylaw New York

SCHWARTZ v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, 289 N.Y. 646 (1942)

SAMUEL SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. HUDSON & MANHATTAN R.R. COMPANY,Respondent., 289 N.Y. 646 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1942)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1942-10-15
Topic: general

SCHWARTZ v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, 289 N.Y. 646 (1942) SAMUEL SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY,Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted October 5, 1942 Decided October 15, 1942 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BENVENGA, J. Travers E. Devlin and John E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCHWARTZ v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, 289 N.Y. 646 (1942). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCHWARTZv.HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY,289 N.Y. 646(1942)

SAMUEL SCHWARTZ, Appellant,v.HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY,

Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted October 5, 1942

Decided October 15, 1942

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BENVENGA, J.Page 647

Travers E. DevlinandJohn E. Buckfor motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion unless the appellant, within thirty days, serves and files an undertaking on appeal, or makes a motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person which is granted, in either of which events the motion is denied.