Opinion · Nylaw New York

SAUTTER v. UTICA CITY NATIONAL BANK, 193 N.Y. 661 (1908)

CHRISTIAN SAUTTER, Appellant, v. UTICA CITY Nat’l BANK et al.,Respondents., 87 N.E. 1129 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1908)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1908-01-01
Topic: general

SAUTTER v. UTICA CITY NATIONAL BANK, 193 N.Y. 661 (1908) 87 N.E. 1129 CHRISTIAN SAUTTER, Appellant, v. UTICA CITY NATIONAL BANK et al.,Respondents.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 17, 1908 Decided December 1, 1908 Smith M. Lindsley and William S. Mackie for appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SAUTTER v. UTICA CITY NATIONAL BANK, 193 N.Y. 661 (1908). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SAUTTERv. UTICA CITY NATIONAL BANK,193 N.Y. 661(1908)

87 N.E. 1129

CHRISTIAN SAUTTER, Appellant,v. UTICA CITY NATIONAL BANK et al.,

Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 17, 1908

Decided December 1, 1908

Page 662

Smith M. LindsleyandWilliam S. Mackiefor appellant.Thomas S. JonesandJ. De P. Lynchfor respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.