Opinion · Nylaw New York

ROZELL v. ROZELL, 256 App. Div. 883 (1939)

ERNEST A. ROZELL, an Infant, by ERNEST D. ROZELL, His Guardian ad Litem,Respondent, v. EVELYN D. ROZELL, an Infant, by GEORGE ROZELL, Her Guardianad Litem, Appellant., 256 A.D. 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1939-01-25
Topic: general

ROZELL v. ROZELL, 256 App. Div. 883 (1939) ERNEST A. ROZELL, an Infant, by ERNEST D. ROZELL, His Guardian ad Litem,Respondent, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ROZELL v. ROZELL, 256 App. Div. 883 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ROZELL v. ROZELL,256 App. Div. 883(1939)

ERNEST A. ROZELL, an Infant, by ERNEST D. ROZELL, His Guardian ad Litem,

Respondent, v. EVELYN D. ROZELL, an Infant, by GEORGE ROZELL, Her Guardian

ad Litem, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

January 25, 1939.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Hill, P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.