Opinion · Nylaw New York

ROTHBAUM v. ROTHBAUM, 76 N.Y.2d 770 (1990)

BENJAMIN ROTHBAUM, Respondent, v. STELLA F. ROTHBAUM, Appellant., 559 N.E.2d 673 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1990)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1990-06-14
Topic: general

ROTHBAUM v. ROTHBAUM, 76 N.Y.2d 770 (1990) 559 N.E.2d 673, 559 N.Y.S.2d 979 BENJAMIN ROTHBAUM, Respondent, v. STELLA F. ROTHBAUM, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted April 23, 1990 Decided June 14, 1990 Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to file with the court copies of each order or judgment, together with its notice of entry, as well as copies of all opinions or memoranda rendered in the courts below as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ROTHBAUM v. ROTHBAUM, 76 N.Y.2d 770 (1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ROTHBAUM v. ROTHBAUM,76 N.Y.2d 770(1990)

559 N.E.2d 673,559 N.Y.S.2d 979

BENJAMIN ROTHBAUM, Respondent, v. STELLA F. ROTHBAUM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted April 23, 1990

Decided June 14, 1990

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to file with the court copies of each order or judgment, together with its notice of entry, as well as copies of all opinions or memoranda rendered in the courts below as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).