Opinion · Nylaw New York

ROSEN v. LEIBOWITZ PICKLE WORKS, INC., 257 App. Div. 855 (1939)

257 App. Div. 855

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1939-05-23
Topic: general

ROSEN v. LEIBOWITZ PICKLE WORKS, INC., 257 App. Div. 855 (1939) HANNAH ROSEN, LOUIS ROSEN and MARTIN ROSENBERG, Respondents, v. LEIBOWITZPICKLE WORKS, INC., Appellant, and IRVING SACKEROFF, Defendant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. May 23, 1939.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ROSEN v. LEIBOWITZ PICKLE WORKS, INC., 257 App. Div. 855 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ROSEN v. LEIBOWITZ PICKLE WORKS, INC.,257 App. Div. 855(1939)

HANNAH ROSEN, LOUIS ROSEN and MARTIN ROSENBERG, Respondents, v. LEIBOWITZ

PICKLE WORKS, INC., Appellant, and IRVING SACKEROFF, Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

May 23, 1939.

Page 856

Plaintiffs sued to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when struck by the automobile of defendant Sackeroff on a public sidewalk. It was alleged that a truck of defendant Leibowitz Pickle Works, Inc., was negligently parked in the roadway and that Sackeroff, in avoiding a collision with a third automobile, in an emergency was forced to swerve his car to the sidewalk. Judgment for plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Lazansky P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.