Opinion · Nylaw New York

ROBERTSON v. SCHOONMAKER, 242 App. Div. 647 (1934)

DOUGLAS O. ROBERTSON, Suing for Himself as S’holder, & All OtherStockholders of MARINE TRANSIT Corp. in Like Situation Who ShallChoose to Make Themselves Parties to This Action, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D.SCHOONMAKER & Others, Appellants, Impleaded with COURTLAND PALMER andOthers, Defendants, & GERALD A. FAGAN, Respondent. (Action No. 2.), 242 A.D. 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New Yor

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1934-01-01
Topic: general

ROBERTSON v. SCHOONMAKER, 242 App. Div. 647 (1934) DOUGLAS O. ROBERTSON, Suing for Himself as Stockholder, and All OtherStockholders of MARINE TRANSIT CORPORATION in Like Situation Who ShallChoose to Make Themselves Parties to This Action, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D.SCHOONMAKER and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with COURTLAND PALMER andOthers, Defendants, and GERALD A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ROBERTSON v. SCHOONMAKER, 242 App. Div. 647 (1934). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ROBERTSON v. SCHOONMAKER,242 App. Div. 647(1934)

DOUGLAS O. ROBERTSON, Suing for Himself as Stockholder, and All Other

Stockholders of MARINE TRANSIT CORPORATION in Like Situation Who Shall

Choose to Make Themselves Parties to This Action, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D.

SCHOONMAKER and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with COURTLAND PALMER and

Others, Defendants, and GERALD A. FAGAN, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

June, 1934.

Page 648

Order granting motion of defendant Fagan to bring in additional parties defendant, appointing a receiver of the various corporate defendants, and enjoining various defendants, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.