Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
RIEL v. SUN, 66 Wn. App. 1004 (1992)
THOMAS RIEL, ET AL, Plaintiffs, v. ASHLEY Y.J. SUN, ET AL, Appellants,OLYMPIC FOREST PRODUCTS, ET AL, Respondents., 66 Wash. App. 1004 (Wash. Ct. App. 1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1992-06-15
- Topic
- general
RIEL v. SUN, 66 Wn. App. 1004 (1992) THOMAS RIEL, ET AL, Plaintiffs, v. ASHLEY Y.J. SUN, ET AL, Appellants,OLYMPIC FOREST PRODUCTS, ET AL, Respondents.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed RIEL v. SUN, 66 Wn. App. 1004 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
RIEL v. SUN,66 Wn. App. 1004(1992)
THOMAS RIEL, ET AL,Plaintiffs,v. ASHLEY Y.J. SUN, ET AL,Appellants,
OLYMPIC FOREST PRODUCTS, ET AL,Respondents.
No. 28310-3-I.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
June 15, 1992.
UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 87-2-17605-3, Peter K. Steere, J., entered March 25, 1991.
Affirmedby unpublished opinion per Grosse, C.J., concurred in by Baker and Agid, JJ.Page 1005
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩