Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

RIDDICK v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, 292 Conn. 913 (2009)

JEFFREY RIDDICK v. Comm’r OF CORRECTION., 973 A.2d 663 (Conn. 2009)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2009-06-25
Topic: general

RIDDICK v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, 292 Conn. 913 (2009) 973 A.2d 663 JEFFREY RIDDICK v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.Supreme Court of Connecticut The petitioner Jeffrey Riddick's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 456 (AC 27975), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the habeas court granting the motion of the petitioner's counsel to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RIDDICK v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, 292 Conn. 913 (2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RIDDICK v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION,292 Conn. 913(2009)

973 A.2d 663

JEFFREY RIDDICK v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The petitioner Jeffrey Riddick's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,113 Conn. App. 456(AC 27975), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the habeas court granting the motion of the petitioner's counsel to withdraw pursuant toAndersv.California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L. Ed. 2d 493(1967)?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18394.

Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 25, 2009