Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

REHEARING DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1434 (1991)

REHEARING DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1434 (1991), 62 Ohio St. 3d 1434 (Ohio 1991)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1991-01-01
Topic: general

REHEARING DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1434 (1991) 578 N.E.2d 821-826Supreme Court of Ohio. 1991. REHEARING DOCKET Wednesday, October 16, 1991 90-1008. Hoover Universal, Inc. v. Limbach. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 87-D-771, 87-C-772 and 87-J-773.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed REHEARING DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1434 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

REHEARING DOCKET,62 Ohio St.3d 1434(1991)

578 N.E.2d 821-826

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1991.

REHEARING DOCKET

Wednesday, October 16, 1991

90-1008.Hoover Universal, Inc. v. Limbach. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 87-D-771, 87-C-772 and 87-J-773. Reported at61 Ohio St.3d 563,575 N.E.2d 811. On motion for rehearing. Rehearing denied.

RESNICK, J., dissents.90-1052.Little Forest Medical Ctr. of Akron v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm.Summit County, No. 14312. Reported at61 Ohio St.3d 607,575 N.E.2d 1164. On motion for rehearing.Page 1435Rehearing denied.

MOYER, C.J., HOLMES and WRIGHT, JJ., dissent.91-969.Huston v. Morris.Franklin County, No. 90AP-1009. Reported at61 Ohio St.3d 1427,575 N.E.2d 216. On motion for reconsideration of denial of motion to certify the record. Motion denied.

SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent.91-1376.Haller v. Haller.Cuyahoga County, No. 58739. Reported at62 Ohio St.3d 1403,577 N.E.2d 357. On motion for rehearing. Rehearing denied.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.