Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 71 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1995)
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 71 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1995), 71 Ohio St. 3d 1494 (Ohio 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohlaw Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohlaw
- Date
- 1995-01-01
- Topic
- general
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 71 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1995) 646 N.E.2d 463-469Supreme Court of Ohio. 1995. RECONSIDERATION DOCKET Wednesday, March 15, 1995 94-2099. Smith v. Cosco, Inc. Hamilton County, No.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 71 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET,71 Ohio St.3d 1494(1995)
646 N.E.2d 463-469
Supreme Court of Ohio.
1995.
Wednesday, March 15, 1995
94-2099.Smith v. Cosco, Inc.Hamilton County, No. C-940289. Reported at71 Ohio St.3d 1462,644 N.E.2d 1385. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.94-2165.State v. Combs.Hamilton County, No. C-930498. Reported at71 Ohio St.3d 1472,645 N.E.2d 735. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.94-2170.State v. Durr.Cuyahoga County, No. 65958. Reported at71 Ohio St.3d 1455,644 N.E.2d 1028. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.94-2200.Ravens Metal Products, Inc. v. Harrett Corp.Tuscarawas County, No. 93AP100068. Reported at71 Ohio St.3d 1458,644 N.E.2d 1030. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
WRIGHT and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.94-2228.State v. Nunn.Cuyahoga County, No. 66221. Reported at71 Ohio St.3d 1455,644 N.E.2d 1028. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.94-2295.Costidakis v. Park Corp.Cuyahoga County, No. 66167. Reported at71 Ohio St.3d 1459,644 N.E.2d 1031. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.Page 1495