Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PUGH v. PROBSTFIELD, 75 Or. App. 328 (1985)

705 P.2d 1158

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1985-09-18
Topic
general

PUGH v. PROBSTFIELD, 75 Or. App. 328 (1985) 705 P.2d 1158 PUGH, Appellant, v. PROBSTFIELD, Respondent. 84-0331C; CA A32182Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted June 17, 1985. Reversed and remanded with instructions September 18, 1985.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PUGH v. PROBSTFIELD, 75 Or. App. 328 (1985). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PUGH v. PROBSTFIELD,75 Or. App. 328(1985)
705 P.2d 1158
PUGH,Appellant,v. PROBSTFIELD,Respondent.
84-0331C; CA A32182
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted June 17, 1985.
Reversed and remanded with instructions September 18, 1985.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County, Karl W. Freerksen, Jr., Judge Pro Tempore.
Bradley C. Grove, Forest Grove, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jeff Bennett, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment allowing defendant 30 days within which to file delayed direct appeal.Page 329
PER CURIAM
In this post-conviction proceeding, defendant concedes that the trial court erred in denying petitioner the right to file a delayed direct appeal of his conviction. We have concluded that the concession is correct.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment allowing defendant 30 days within which to file a delayed direct appeal.Page 330