Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

PRIORITY E.M.S., INC. v. CRESCENT CITY E.M.S., 600 So.2d 660 (La. 1992)

PRIORITY E.M.S., INC. v. CRESCENT CITY E.M.S. INC. D/B/A MEDIC ONE, INC.AND MEDIC ONE., 600 So. 2d 660 (La. 1992)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1992-06-26
Topic: general

PRIORITY E.M.S., INC. v. CRESCENT CITY E.M.S., 600 So.2d 660 (La. 1992) PRIORITY E.M.S., INC. v. CRESCENT CITY E.M.S. INC. D/B/A MEDIC ONE, INC.AND MEDIC ONE.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PRIORITY E.M.S., INC. v. CRESCENT CITY E.M.S., 600 So.2d 660 (La. 1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PRIORITY E.M.S., INC. v. CRESCENT CITY E.M.S.,600 So.2d 660(La. 1992)

PRIORITY E.M.S., INC. v. CRESCENT CITY E.M.S. INC. D/B/A MEDIC ONE, INC.

AND MEDIC ONE.

No. 92-CC-1198.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1992.

In re Priority E. M. S, Inc.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. "B", No. 64-668; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92DW-0360.

[1] Denied.

[2] CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ.