Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

POWERS v. NEW YORK, CHICAGO ST. LOUIS RD., 122 Ohio St. 608 (1930)

POWERS v. N.Y., Chi. ST. LOUIS RD. CO., 174 N.E. 251 (Ohio 1930)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1930-04-16
Topic
general

POWERS v. NEW YORK, CHICAGO ST. LOUIS RD., 122 Ohio St. 608 (1930) 174 N.E. 251 POWERS ET AL. v. NEW YORK, CHICAGO ST. LOUIS RD.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed POWERS v. NEW YORK, CHICAGO ST. LOUIS RD., 122 Ohio St. 608 (1930). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

POWERS v. NEW YORK, CHICAGO ST. LOUIS RD.,122 Ohio St. 608(1930)
174 N.E. 251
POWERS ET AL. v. NEW YORK, CHICAGO ST. LOUIS RD. CO. ET AL.
No. 22224
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided April 16, 1930.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutionalquestion involved.
ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.Page 609
Messrs. J.R. H.R. SnyderandMessrs. Hamilton Kramer, for plaintiffs in error.Messrs. Tolles, Hogsett Ginn, Mr. Harold H. Burton, director of law,Mr. Leslie NicholsandMr. Joseph H. Smith, for defendants in error.
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.Petition in error dismissed.

KINKADE, JONES, MATTHIAS and DAY, JJ., concur.

ROBINSON and ALLEN, JJ., not participating.