Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

PORTER v. COKATO COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASS'N, 160 F.2d 107 (8th Cir. 1947)

160 F.2d 107

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1947-01-07
Topic: general

PORTER v. COKATO COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASS'N, 160 F.2d 107 (8th Cir. 1947) Paul A. PORTER, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, Appellant,v. COKATO COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSOCIATION, a Corporation. No. 13424.Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PORTER v. COKATO COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASS'N, 160 F.2d 107 (8th Cir. 1947). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PORTER v. COKATO COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASS'N,160 F.2d 107(8th Cir. 1947)

Paul A. PORTER, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, Appellant,

v. COKATO COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSOCIATION, a Corporation.

No. 13424.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

January 7, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

William Remy, Deputy Administrator for Enforcement, David London, Litigation Division, Albert M. Dreyer, Chief Appellate Branch, all of Washington D.C., Isadore L. Kovitz, Regional Enforcement Executive, of Chicago, Ill., and George E. Leonard, Regional Litigation Attorney, and Jacob Cohen, Chief, Review and Disposition Unit, Office of Price Administration, both of Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Robert O. Sullivan and Harold Jordan, both of St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court,65 F. Supp. 974, dismissed without costs to either party, on stipulation of parties.Page 108