Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

PICARIELLO v. LINARES RESCIGNO BANK, 127 N.J.L. 565 (1942)

23 A.2d 396

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1942-01-09
Topic
general

PICARIELLO v. LINARES RESCIGNO BANK, 127 N.J.L. 565 (1942) 23 A.2d 396 ANGELINE PICARIELLO ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. LINARES AND RESCIGNO BANK,APPELLANT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 31, 1941 — Decided January 9, 1942. On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in127 N.J.L. 63. For the respondents, David Cohn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PICARIELLO v. LINARES RESCIGNO BANK, 127 N.J.L. 565 (1942). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PICARIELLO v. LINARES RESCIGNO BANK,127 N.J.L. 565(1942)
23 A.2d 396
ANGELINE PICARIELLO ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. LINARES AND RESCIGNO BANK,
APPELLANT.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Submitted October 31, 1941 —
Decided January 9, 1942.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in127 N.J.L. 63.
For the respondents,David Cohn.

For the appellant,Collins Corbin.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.For reversal— None.Page 566