Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 316 Or. 529 (1993)

316 Or. 529

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1993-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 316 Or. 529 (1993) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (854 P.2d 940)Oregon Supreme Court. 1993. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DENIED May 25, 1993 State v. Moody, Brian Scott (A72441) (S40175) (119 Or. App. 174) State v. Nash, Christopher P. (A71630) (S40137) (118 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 316 Or. 529 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED,316 Or. 529(1993)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(854 P.2d 940)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1993.
DENIED
May 25, 1993
State v. Moody, Brian Scott (A72441) (S40175) (119 Or. App. 174)

State v. Nash, Christopher P. (A71630) (S40137) (118 Or. App. 540)

State v. Odoms, Donald Gonzales (A60041) (S40091) (117 Or. App. 1)

State v. Sickler, Donald Leroy (A76455) (S40074) (118 Or. App. 360)

State v. Williams, Lydia Rae (A72791) (S40069) (118 Or. App. 162). Unis, J., would allow.

Steele, Edward Bert v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A72721) (S40078) (117 Or. App. 621)

Temple, Daniel Allen v. Zenon (A65600) (S40056) (118 Or. App. 162)

Thorn, Mack Hobart v. Maass (A74738) (S40040) (118 Or. App. 162)

Thyfault v. Pendleton School District No. 16 (A73019) (S40043) (116 Or. App. 675)

Viking Industries v. Gilliam (A73511) (S40099) (118 Or. App. 183)

Von Lubken v. Hood River County (A77772) (S40095) (118 Or. App. 246)

Walkup v. Cushing (A71853) (S39957) (117 Or. App. 351)

Warren v. Farmers Insurance Company (A61445) (S39873) (115 Or. App. 319) Van Hoomissen and Unis, JJ., would allow.

Welches School District No. 13 v. Welches Education Association/OEA/NEA (A67836) (S39972) (116 Or. App. 564)

White, Terry James v. Maass (A70247) (S40068) (118 Or. App. 162)Page 530
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩