Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 312 Or. 526 (1991)

PETITIONS FOR Rev. ALLOWED & DENIED, 312 Or. 526 (1991), 312 Or. 526 (Or. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1991-11-26
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 312 Or. 526 (1991) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (822 P.2d 1194, 1195)Oregon Supreme Court. November 26, 1991. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DENIED Nickel v. MVD (A67670) (S38571) (109 Or. App. 75) Rivera v. Pacific Northwest Bell (A68899) (S38540) (109 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 312 Or. 526 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED,312 Or. 526(1991)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(822 P.2d 1194, 1195)
Oregon Supreme Court.
November 26, 1991.
DENIED
Nickel v. MVD (A67670) (S38571) (109 Or. App. 75)

Rivera v. Pacific Northwest Bell (A68899) (S38540) (109 Or. App. 75)

Rose, Brian Allen v. Board of Parole (A64289) (S38251) (107 Or. App. 532) The court's order of July 23, 1991, denying review (311 Or. 643) was vacated November 6, 1991, and matter was resubmitted to the court.

Roseburg Forest Products v. Pantekoek (A66162) (S38392) (108 Or. App. 190)

Sherriff, Richard John v. Maass (A66810) (S38462) (108 Or. App. 365)

Sims, Alfred Lynn v. Board of Parole (A65923) (S38558) (108 Or. App. 778)

Smurfit Newsprint v. Lewis (A66595) (S38485) (108 Or. App. 366)

Solic, Marcos v. Zenon (A66440) (S38496) (108 Or. App. 360)

State ex rel Burgess v. Pearce (A69002) (S38585) (109 Or. App. 220)

State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. Evjen (A66300) (S38445) (107 Or. App. 659)

State v. Anderson, Willie Roy (A66310) (S38497) (108 Or. App. 778)

State v. Beck, Gloria Jeanni (A66132) (S38593) (109 Or. App. 219)

State v. Carver, Montana Wayne (A63628) (S38350) (107 Or. App. 383)

State v. Erbs, Bruce Scott (A65490) (S38498) (108 Or. App. 778)

State v. Erickson, William Carl (A64613) (S38484) (108 Or. App. 367)

State v. Furgerson, James Thomas Jr. (A64854) (S38628) (109 Or. App. 219)

State v. Gibbons, Sylvester Adrian (A66359) (S38321) (107 Or. App. 383) Unis, J., would allow.

State v. Gustafson, William Mac (A66406) (S38555) (108 Or. App. 778)

State v. Halford, Darrell Allen (A66913) (S38570) (109 Or. App. 75) Unis, J., would allow.

State v. Letchworth, Thomas (A65997) (S38431) (108 Or. App. 340)

State v. Matthews, Thomas Jerome III (A66900) (S38535) (108 Or. App. 575) Graber, J., would allow.

State v. Nethercott, Joel J. (A63896) (S38528) (108 Or. App. 367)

State v. Pascoe, Richard Marvin (A64431) (S38374) (107 Or. App. 784)

State v. Pena, Erasmo Hernandez (A62255) (S38457) (108 Or. App. 171) Fadeley and Unis, JJ., would allow.

State v. Phelps, Dale (A66461) (S38410) (108 Or. App. 195)

State v. Poindexter, Irvin Lavone (A66172) (S38480) (108 Or. App. 367) Unis, J., would allow.

State v. Read, Gary (A65522) (S38499) (108 Or. App. 778)

State v. Rose, Jason Wayne (A65456) (S38580) (109 Or. App. 219)

State v. Scott, Vernon (A66478) (S38470) (108 Or. App. 365)

State v. Smith, Moton Ray (A66309) (S38629) (109 Or. App. 219)

State v. Stickney, John Wesley (A65863/64) (S38559) (108 Or. App. 778)

State v. Sweely, Dale R., Sr.; State v. Sweely, Dale Richard Sr. (A66275/76) (S38531) (108 Or. App. 778)

State v. Weighall, Craig F. (A66422) (S38407) (108 Or. App. 195)

State v. Wells, Tyra Lynn (A65001) (S38460) (108 Or. App. 195)

State v. Whaley, Leslie Arthur (A60381) (S38425) (108 Or. App. 365) Fadeley, J., would allow.

State v. Widerstrom, Michael Dean (A61948) (S38620) (109 Or. App. 18)

State v. Williams, Eddie Leon (A66850) (S38603) (109 Or. App. 219)

Tran, Dang Minh v. Board of Parole (A66106) (S38560) (108 Or. App. 778)

Turnbull v. Environmental Quality Commission (A66392) (S38402) (108 Or. App. 195)

Wilson, Thomas Reid v. Maass (A67171) (S38617) (109 Or. App. 75)

Wolhaupter-Heinzel and Heinzel (A63385) (S38564) (108 Or. App. 514)Page 527
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩