Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 290 Or. 853 (1981)
290 Or. 853
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1981-04-21
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 290 Or. 853 (1981) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED ALLOWEDOregon Supreme Court. April 21, 1981. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pender v. Builders Board (16635) (27589) (49 Or. App. 843) Watzig v. Tobin (17350) (27686) (50 Or.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 290 Or. 853 (1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED,290 Or. 853(1981)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIEDALLOWED
Oregon Supreme Court.
April 21, 1981.
Pender v. Builders Board (16635) (27589) (49 Or. App. 843)
Watzig v. Tobin (17350) (27686) (50 Or. App. 539)
State v. Kersting, Dennis Dean (15260) (27698) (50 Or. App. 461)
State v. York, Rosie Lee (17770) (27711) (51 Or. App. 155)
Cook v. Clackamas County (16241) (27644) (50 Or. App. 75)
Davison v. Parker (16519) (27653) (50 Or. App. 129)
Bartlam v. Tikka (17278) (27663) (50 Or. App. 217)
State v. Johnson, John Jay (18219) (27684) (49 Or. App. 729)
Harris v. Hegstrom (18192) (27687) (50 Or. App. 616)
Rogers and Rogers (14842) (27690) (50 Or. App. 611)
State v. Nelson, James Allen (17585) (27692) (50 Or. App. 297)
Gerlitz and Gerlitz (17623) (27694) (50 Or. App. 443)
Jones Sport Company v. National Council (18998) (27696) (50 Or. App. 611)
State v. Meyer, Stephen Emil (18344) (27699) (50 Or. App. 611)
Marsh v. Pullen (17097) (27700) (50 Or. App. 405)
Sharp v. Cupp (18282) (27701) (50 Or. App. 2)
Ford v. Blinn (15584) (27697) (50 Or. App. 515)
Dukes-Elligan v. Dukes (19423) (27639) (no opinion)
Williams v. Spinola (appellant's petition) (15955) (27641) (50 Or. App. 87)
Williams v. Spinola (respondent's petition) (15955) (27641) (50 Or. App. 87)
Associates Development v. Kane (17165) (27646) (50 Or. App. 2)
Stoner Electric v. Gaudry (17927) (27688) (50 Or. App. 377)
Safeco Insurance v. Tualatin Development (17407) (27703) (50 Or. App. 521)
State v. Greaves, Kevin Cory (18800) (27704) (50 Or. App. 616)
Spooner v. Marion County Board of Commissioners (19229) (27723) (51 Or. App. 1)
Rodacker v. State (17455) (27717) (50 Or. App. 2)Page 854
Watzig v. Tobin (17350) (27686) (50 Or. App. 539)
State v. Kersting, Dennis Dean (15260) (27698) (50 Or. App. 461)
April 28, 1981
Waterman v. Armstrong (18224) (27691) (50 Or. App. 611)
State v. York, Rosie Lee (17770) (27711) (51 Or. App. 155)
DENIED
April 21, 1981
Jewell and Jewell (15891) (27587) (49 Or. App. 903)
Cook v. Clackamas County (16241) (27644) (50 Or. App. 75)
Davison v. Parker (16519) (27653) (50 Or. App. 129)
Bartlam v. Tikka (17278) (27663) (50 Or. App. 217)
State v. Johnson, John Jay (18219) (27684) (49 Or. App. 729)
Harris v. Hegstrom (18192) (27687) (50 Or. App. 616)
Rogers and Rogers (14842) (27690) (50 Or. App. 611)
State v. Nelson, James Allen (17585) (27692) (50 Or. App. 297)
Gerlitz and Gerlitz (17623) (27694) (50 Or. App. 443)
Jones Sport Company v. National Council (18998) (27696) (50 Or. App. 611)
State v. Meyer, Stephen Emil (18344) (27699) (50 Or. App. 611)
Marsh v. Pullen (17097) (27700) (50 Or. App. 405)
Sharp v. Cupp (18282) (27701) (50 Or. App. 2)
Ford v. Blinn (15584) (27697) (50 Or. App. 515)
April 28, 1981
Cherkezov v. Universal Underwriters (16541) (27637) (49 Or. App. 741)
Dukes-Elligan v. Dukes (19423) (27639) (no opinion)
Williams v. Spinola (appellant's petition) (15955) (27641) (50 Or. App. 87)
Williams v. Spinola (respondent's petition) (15955) (27641) (50 Or. App. 87)
Associates Development v. Kane (17165) (27646) (50 Or. App. 2)
Stoner Electric v. Gaudry (17927) (27688) (50 Or. App. 377)
Safeco Insurance v. Tualatin Development (17407) (27703) (50 Or. App. 521)
State v. Greaves, Kevin Cory (18800) (27704) (50 Or. App. 616)
Spooner v. Marion County Board of Commissioners (19229) (27723) (51 Or. App. 1)
Rodacker v. State (17455) (27717) (50 Or. App. 2)Page 854
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 855
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩