Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 322 Or. 613 (1996)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 322 Or. 613 (1996), 322 Or. 613 (Or. 1996)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1996-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 322 Or. 613 (1996) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (911 P.2d 1230, 1231)Oregon Supreme Court. 1996. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DENIED February 13, 1996 Thompson, Robert R. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A86578) (S42963) (138 Or. App. 376) Warren, Gregory v. Maass (A86372) (S42831) (137 Or. App. 438) Williford, Vernon v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 322 Or. 613 (1996). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,322 Or. 613(1996)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW(911 P.2d 1230, 1231)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1996.
DENIED
February 13, 1996
Thompson, Robert R. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A86578) (S42963) (138 Or. App. 376)

Warren, Gregory v. Maass (A86372) (S42831) (137 Or. App. 438)

Williford, Vernon v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A83435) (S42710) (137 Or. App. 254)

Wooton v. Viking Distributing Co., Inc. (A85485) (S42577) (136 Or. App. 56) . Abeyance order vacated; petition for review denied. Unis and Graber, JJ., would allow.
February 20, 1996
Kosatka and Kosatka (A84227) (S42788) (137 Or. App. 379)

Lacy v. City of Aumsville (A87240) (S43011) (138 Or. App. 375)

Ruddell v. Ruddell Family Partnership (A82776) (S42971) (138 Or. App. 305)

State v. Cook, Herbert Dale (A87002) (S42982) (138 Or. App. 376)

State v. Cunio, Sterling Ray (A86156) (S42981) (138 Or. App. 375). Van Hoomissen and Fadeley, JJ., would allow.

State v. Lewis, Carl Gene (A85919-27) (S42687) (137 Or. App. 108)Page 614
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩