Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 320 Or. 492 (1994)

320 Or. 492

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1994-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 320 Or. 492 (1994) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (887 P.2d 792, 793)Oregon Supreme Court. 1994. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED December 20, 1994 Dietz v. Ramuda (A81010) (S41759) (130 Or. App. 397) Eagle Industries, Inc. v. Thompson (A74864) (S41463) (127 Or. App. 595) Edison v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 320 Or. 492 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,320 Or. 492(1994)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW(887 P.2d 792, 793)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1994.
ALLOWED
December 20, 1994
Dietz v. Ramuda (A81010) (S41759) (130 Or. App. 397)

Eagle Industries, Inc. v. Thompson (A74864) (S41463) (127 Or. App. 595)

Edison v. Judicial Department (A79872) (S41599) (127 Or. App. 753)

GTE Northwest Incorporated v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon (A81647) (S41791) (130 Or. App. 637)

Shaw v. PACC Health Plan, Inc. (A76072) (S41799) (130 Or. App. 32)

State v. Kitzman, Mark Michael (A77967) (S41724) (129 Or. App. 520) (Kitzman's petition)

State v. Kitzman, Mark Michael (A77967) (S41793) (129 Or. App. 520) (State's petition)
December 27, 1994
Sutherland v. Brennan (A80719) (S41835) (131 Or. App. 25)
DENIED
December 20, 1994
Aslakson v. Water Resources Department (A83388) (S41763) (130 Or. App. 678)

Barrett Business Services v. Hames (A82521) (S41732) (130 Or. App. 190). Carson, C.J., would allow.

Hamilton v. Moon (A77859) (S41788) (130 Or. App. 403). Unis, J., would allow.

House v. Hager and Martin (A78329) (S41783) (130 Or. App. 646). Unis, J., would allow.

Little v. Department of Justice and American First Estate Services, Inc. (A78617) (S41803) (130 Or. App. 668) (American First Estate Services's petition)

Little v. Department of Justice and American First Estate Services, Inc. (A78617) (S41802) (130 Or. App. 668) (Little's petition)

SAIF v. Marshall (A81381) (S41720) (130 Or. App. 507)

Smith v. Department of Water Resources (A77624) (S41834) (130 Or. App. 108)

State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. Falkenhagen (A83565) (S41692) (130 Or. App. 215)

State v. Gold, Carla Faye (A78774) (S41808) (131 Or. App. 267)

State v. Milosevich, Steven Mark (A80779); State v. Milosevich, Nicholas Daniel (A80780) (S41811) (131 Or. App. 51)

State v. Moine, Robert Rowen (A76475) (S41774) (128 Or. App. 530)

State v. Mott, Randal Paul (A79987) (S41825) (131 Or. App. 269)

State v. Poppe, Jerry Ronald (A80782) (S41804) (131 Or. App. 14)Page 493
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩