Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 308 Or. 660 (1989)

308 Or. 660

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1989-12-28
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 308 Or. 660 (1989) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (784 P.2d 1101)Oregon Supreme Court. December 28, 1989. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DENIED Auernheimer v. Metzen (A49371) (S36676) (98 Or. App. 722) Dockery, Michael Conrad v. Maass (A50361) (S36701) (99 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 308 Or. 660 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,308 Or. 660(1989)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(784 P.2d 1101)
Oregon Supreme Court.
December 28, 1989.
DENIED
Auernheimer v. Metzen (A49371) (S36676) (98 Or. App. 722)

Dockery, Michael Conrad v. Maass (A50361) (S36701) (99 Or. App. 219)

Fouts and Fouts (A47921) (S36593) (98 Or. App. 483)

Gary M. Buford Associates, Inc. v. Guillory (A48925) (S36680) (98 Or. App. 691)

Herrera v. Quijano (A49660) (S36668) (98 Or. App. 760)

Lowe, Frank M. v. Board of Parole (A49356) (A50424) (S36661) (98 Or. App. 169)

Loynes, Bobby Lee v. Board of Parole (A61027) (S36692) (99 Or. App. 385)

McKee v. Stoddard (A47236) (S36643) (98 Or. App. 514) (Stoddard's petition). Fadeley, J., would allow.

McKee v. Stoddard (A47236) (S36666) (98 Or. App. 514) (McKee's petition)

Meriweather, Thomas Nicholas v. Board of Parole (A50461) (S36714) (99 Or. App. 373)

Miller, Virgil Steve v. Board of Parole (A60779) (S36664) (99 Or. App. 385)

OSCI v. Bureau of Labor (A49649) (S36635) (98 Or. App. 548)

Overbay v. Ledridge (A48512) (S36328) (97 Or. App. 292)

Paginton, Trevor John v. Maass (A50364) (S36653) (98 Or. App. 513)
(784 P.2d 1102)
Rushin, Joel v. OSP (A60666) (S36691) (99 Or. App. 385)

State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. Sylla (A49996) (S36669) (98 Or. App. 592)

State v. Coleman, Dorothy Diane (A60145) (S36655) (98 Or. App. 55)

State v. Crawford, David Wayne (A49600) (S36681) (99 Or. App. 385). Linde and Fadeley, JJ., would allow.

State v. Daniel, Richard Scott (A49791) (S36667) (98 Or. App. 695)

State v. Dye, David Ira (A50942) (S36702) (99 Or. App. 385)

State v. Hanset, Louis Patrick (A50149) (S36650) (99 Or. App. 214)

State v. Kilcollins, Ronald L. (A49829) (S36704) (99 Or. App. 385)

State v. McDonnell, Jay R. (A45878) (S36559) (98 Or. App. 134)

State v. Mundt, Frank Southard (A46629); State v. Fincher, Susan Frances (A46731) (S36594) (98 Or. App. 407)

State v. Newby, Arthur William (A45352) (S36632) (97 Or. App. 598)

State v. Peterson, Chris Martin (A50263) (S36663) (99 Or. App. 385)

State v. Watson, William Alden (A50873) (S36686) (99 Or. App. 385)

Stricklin v. Stricklin (A47875) (S36627) (97 Or. App. 227)

Tyler v. Hartford Insurance Group (A45275) (S36648) (98 Or. App. 601)

Woolstrum, Glen Dean v. Board of Parole (A51037) (S36644) (98 Or. App. 592)Page 1
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩