Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 305 Or. 467 (1988)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 305 Or. 467 (1988), 305 Or. 467 (Or. 1988)

Type: Opinion
Court: Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction: Orlaw
Date: 1988-04-05
Topic: general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 305 Or. 467 (1988) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (762 P.2d 997)Oregon Supreme Court. April 5, 1988. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED Barton v. SAIF Corp. (A42641) (S34743) (88 Or. App. 306).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 305 Or. 467 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,305 Or. 467(1988)

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(762 P.2d 997)

Oregon Supreme Court.

April 5, 1988.

ALLOWED

Barton v. SAIF Corp. (A42641) (S34743) (88 Or. App. 306). Petitioner's petition for reconsideration allowed, previous denial (305 Or. 103) withdrawn and review allowed.

Larsen v. Osmose Wood Preserving (A42397) (S34792) (87 Or. App. 552) . Petitioner's petition for reconsideration allowed, previous denial (305 Or. 273) withdrawn and review allowed.

(753 P.2d 1381)

Bellikka v. Greene (A42728) (S34821) (88 Or. App. 604)

Employment Division v. Rogue Valley Youth for Christ (A41242) (S34564) (87 Or. App. 573)

Evans v. General Trailer Co. (A43860) (S34922) (89 Or. App. 178)

Fromme v. Fred Meyer, Inc. (A42360) (S34944) (89 Or. App. 397)

State v. Woodley, Rick (A41196) (S34898) (88 Or. App. 493)

DENIED

April 5, 1988

Eckstein v. City of Salem (A46979) (S34958) (on dismissal)

Roof, Franklin David v. Board of Parole (A45436) (S34943) (89 Or. App. 570)

Smith v. SAIF Corp. (A42000) (S34905) (89 Or. App. 178)

State ex rel Woodel v. Wallace (A42847) (S34987) (89 Or. App. 478)

State v. Eldridge, Steven Wayne (A44704) (S34990) (89 Or. App. 570)

Wells, Roy Vertis v. Board of Parole (A44944) (S34969) (89 Or. App. 338)

APPEAL DISMISSED BY STIPULATION

April 6, 1988

Willamette View Associates, Inc. v. Lord (A41110) (S34771) (88 Or. App. 366)Page 468

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩