Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 461 (1986)
302 Or. 461
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1986-12-23
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 461 (1986) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (730 P.2d 1251)Oregon Supreme Court. December 23, 1986. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DENIED Baillie v. State Board of Higher Education (A33426) (S33360) (79 Or. App. 705) Cordway and Cordway (A36067) (S33186) (80 Or. App. 276) Corvallis Aero Service, Inc. v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 461 (1986). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,302 Or. 461(1986)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(730 P.2d 1251)
Oregon Supreme Court.
December 23, 1986.
DENIED
Baillie v. State Board of Higher Education (A33426) (S33360) (79 Or. App. 705)
Cordway and Cordway (A36067) (S33186) (80 Or. App. 276)
Corvallis Aero Service, Inc. v. Villalobos (A37299) (S33333) (81 Or. App. 137)
Ledford v. Umpqua Cutters, Inc. (A37167) (S33433) (on award of costs)
McGill v. SAIF Corp. (A34480) (S33406) (81 Or. App. 210)
Merrifield, Timothy James v. Oregon State Correctional Institution (A39989) (S33439) (82 Or. App. 124)
1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation and Development Commission (Coos County) (A35143) (S33310) (on attorney fees)
State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. Schelling/Schelling (A37885) (S33431) (81 Or. App. 668)
State v. Anderson, Jeffrey Richard (A38505/06/07) (S33451) (82 Or. App. 124)
State v. Jefferson, Archie Lee (A37706) (S33411) (81 Or. App. 479)
State v. Kimball, Charles Stanley (A39311) (S33425) (82 Or. App. 124)
State v. Morgan, Shane Arthur (A37453) (S33254) (80 Or. App. 747)
State v. Smith, Perry Allen (A38770) (S33424) (82 Or. App. 124)
State v. Stevenson, Robert Wayne (A38050) (S33381) (82 Or. App. 122)
State v. Winn, Joseph Douglas (A40440/41) (S33452) (82 Or. App. 124)
Woodfield, Randall B. v. Oregon State Penitentiary (A39952) (S33453) (82 Or. App. 124)
December 30, 1986
Abena v. Morrow (A37120) (S33438) (81 Or. App. 668)
Bendix Home Systems v. Alonzo (A35933) (S33410) (81 Or. App. 450)
Disco Azteca Distributor v. Medina (A37770) (S33459) (82 Or. App. 122)
Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc. (A37168) (S33432) (80 Or. App. 233) (on costs)
Ediger, Homer v. Keeney (A38224) (S33390) (81 Or. App. 446)
Grace, Gerald v. Oregon Board of Parole (A37804) (S33448) (79 Or. App. 546)
Oliver and Oliver (A34655) (S33391) (81 Or. App. 115)
Roberts v. Willamette Industries (A36437) (S33461) (82 Or. App. 188)
Saiville v. EBI Companies (A36422) (S33402) (81 Or. App. 469)
Sheckells and Sheckells (A38380) (S33460) (82 Or. App. 423)
State ex rel Lane County Juvenile Department v. Sauro (A35197) (S33249) (78 Or. App. 670) (Sauro's petition)
State ex rel Lane County Juvenile Department v. Sauro (A35197) (S33250) (78 Or. App. 670) (Nawilo's petition)
State v. Anderson, James Quinten (A41661) (S33404) (on dismissal)
State v. Benner, Joseph C., III (A34801) (S33434) (81 Or. App. 613) Peterson, C.J., would allow
State v. Burroughs, Dathleen Ann (A39331) (S33454) (82 Or. App. 122)
State v. Chiodo, Darcy R. (A38138) (S33419) (80 Or. App. 453)
State v. Crowell, Brian Palmer (A37949/50) (S33442) (82 Or. App. 422)
State v. Dorough, John Patrick Jr. (A39950) (S33485) (82 Or. App. 551)
State v. Hamilton, Robert (A39694) (S33444) (82 Or. App. 124)
State v. Hull, Joseph Ernest (A40039) (S33478) (82 Or. App. 551)
State v. Johnson, Albert (A39286) (S33481) (82 Or. App. 551)
State v. Kyles, James Earl (A37322) (S33458) (81 Or. App. 445)
State v. Nix, John Leroy (A39963) (S33399) (81 Or. App. 669)
(730 P.2d 1252)
State v. Paster, Steven Paul (A38246/47) (S33407) (81 Or. App. 668)
State v. Phillips, Frank Marvin (A37203) (S33377) (81 Or. App. 105)
State v. Salmon, Richard William (A39982) (S33480) (82 Or. App. 551)
State v. Seibert, Blaine Leonard (A39698) (S33471) (82 Or. App. 552)
State v. Settler, Mary (A35093/94/95) (S33412) (81 Or. App. 518)Page 462
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩