Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 291 Or. 117 (1981)
291 Or. 117
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1981-06-02
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 291 Or. 117 (1981) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED ALLOWEDOregon Supreme Court. June 2, 1981. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Whipple v. Howser (18103) (27737) (51 Or. App. 85) ALLOWED June 9, 1981 Blackledge v. Harrington (15518) (27682) (50 Or.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 291 Or. 117 (1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,291 Or. 117(1981)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIEDALLOWED
Oregon Supreme Court.
June 2, 1981.
Whipple v. Howser (18103) (27737) (51 Or. App. 85)
No. Pacific Steamship v. Guarisco (13405) (27511) (49 Or. App. 335)
Franzke and Franzke (17673) (27716) (51 Or. App. 35)
Fisher v. Huck (16258) (27713) (50 Or. App. 635)
Kessel v. Robinson (18780) (27790) (51 Or. App. 367)
Engelland v. Johnstone (18670) (27792) (51 Or. App. 367)
Wolf v. Nordstrom (17116) (27808) (51 Or. App. 715)
Welch v. General Motors (16545) (27727) (50 Or. App. 611)
Miller v. Noel (16743) (27745) (51 Or. App. 243)
State v. Paolo, Roberto (17578) (17579) (27780) (51 Or. App. 365)
State ex rel Angelone v. Mason (19053) (27768) (51 Or. App. 205)
McIntire v. Board of Parole (19563) (27798) (51 Or. App. 366)
State ex rel Roberts v. Westbrook Wood Products (18803) (27795) (51 Or. App. 366) (Tongue, J., would allow)
Cherry v. Motor Vehicles (18884) (27796) (51 Or. App. 366)
D.M. Development Co. v. Osburn (14411) (27729) (49 Or. App. 863)
Preston and Preston (17715) (27747) (51 Or. App. 205)
Fisher v. Colwell (17417) (17460) (27753) (51 Or. App. 301)
Harris v. Barnum (16758) (27770) (51 Or. App. 472)
State v. Ruiz, Primitivo (17227) (17228) (27775) (50 Or. App. 616)
Holemar v. Holemar (18135) (27776) (51 Or. App. 365)
Griswold v. Bagley (16560) (27784) (51 Or. App. 365)
Spray v. Board of Medical Examiners (petitioner's petition) (14039) (27673) (50 Or. App. 311)
Cascade Broadcasting v. Groener (15883) (27793) (51 Or. App. 533)
State v. Ragghianti, Donald A. (18795) (27788) (51 Or. App. 367)
Portland Electric Plumbing v. Cooke (18067) (27791) (51 Or. App. 555)Page 118
ALLOWED
June 9, 1981
Blackledge v. Harrington (15518) (27682) (50 Or. App. 493)
No. Pacific Steamship v. Guarisco (13405) (27511) (49 Or. App. 335)
Franzke and Franzke (17673) (27716) (51 Or. App. 35)
Fisher v. Huck (16258) (27713) (50 Or. App. 635)
Kessel v. Robinson (18780) (27790) (51 Or. App. 367)
Engelland v. Johnstone (18670) (27792) (51 Or. App. 367)
Wolf v. Nordstrom (17116) (27808) (51 Or. App. 715)
DENIED
June 2, 1981
State ex rel Juvenile Department of Marion County v. Spicer (17787) (27712) (50 Or. App. 127)
Welch v. General Motors (16545) (27727) (50 Or. App. 611)
Miller v. Noel (16743) (27745) (51 Or. App. 243)
State v. Paolo, Roberto (17578) (17579) (27780) (51 Or. App. 365)
State ex rel Angelone v. Mason (19053) (27768) (51 Or. App. 205)
McIntire v. Board of Parole (19563) (27798) (51 Or. App. 366)
State ex rel Roberts v. Westbrook Wood Products (18803) (27795) (51 Or. App. 366) (Tongue, J., would allow)
Cherry v. Motor Vehicles (18884) (27796) (51 Or. App. 366)
DENIED
June 16, 1981
Gaffey v. Babb (13882) (27709) (50 Or. App. 617)
D.M. Development Co. v. Osburn (14411) (27729) (49 Or. App. 863)
Preston and Preston (17715) (27747) (51 Or. App. 205)
Fisher v. Colwell (17417) (17460) (27753) (51 Or. App. 301)
Harris v. Barnum (16758) (27770) (51 Or. App. 472)
State v. Ruiz, Primitivo (17227) (17228) (27775) (50 Or. App. 616)
Holemar v. Holemar (18135) (27776) (51 Or. App. 365)
Griswold v. Bagley (16560) (27784) (51 Or. App. 365)
Spray v. Board of Medical Examiners (petitioner's petition) (14039) (27673) (50 Or. App. 311)
Cascade Broadcasting v. Groener (15883) (27793) (51 Or. App. 533)
State v. Ragghianti, Donald A. (18795) (27788) (51 Or. App. 367)
Portland Electric Plumbing v. Cooke (18067) (27791) (51 Or. App. 555)Page 118
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩