Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 331 N.C. 119 (1992)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 331 N.C. 119 (1992), 331 N.C. 119 (N.C. 1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1992-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 331 N.C. 119 (1992)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1992 SALT v. APPLIED ANALYTICAL, INC. No. 35P92 Case below: 104 N.C. App. 652 Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 March 1992. STATE v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 331 N.C. 119 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,331 N.C. 119(1992)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1992
Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 March 1992.
STATE v. BRADDOCK No. 539P91 Case below:104 N.C. App. 554
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 March 1992.
STATE v. BUTLER No. 31P92 Case below:104 N.C. App. 804
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 March 1992.
STATE v. CLAYTON No. 16P92 Case below:101 N.C. App. 575
Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 March 1992. Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 March 1992.
STATE v. CORNELIUS No. 10P92 Case below:104 N.C. App. 583
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 March 1992.Page 120