Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 329 N.C. 498 (1991)

329 N.C. 498

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1991-01-01
Topic: general

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 329 N.C. 498 (1991)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1991 MATTHEWS v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION No. 81P90 Case below: 97 N.C. App. 142 326 N.C. 483 326 N.C. 597 Motion by plaintiff to reconsider petition for discretionary review dismissed 14 August 1991.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 329 N.C. 498 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,329 N.C. 498(1991)

Supreme Court of North Carolina

1991

MATTHEWS v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION No. 81P90 Case below:97 N.C. App. 142 326 N.C. 483 326 N.C. 597

Motion by plaintiff to reconsider petition for discretionary review dismissed 14 August 1991.

METRIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS No. 180A91 Case below:102 N.C. App. 59

Petition by defendant (Insurers) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31allowed 14 August 1991.

MORGAN v. MUSSELWHITE No. 71P91 Case below:101 N.C. App. 390

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 14 August 1991.

MOZINGO v. PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL No. 162A91 Case below:101 N.C. App. 578

Petition by defendant (Kazior) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to additional issues denied 14 August 1991.

MYOKINETEX, INC. v. MXI GROUP, INC. No. 279P91 Case below:102 N.C. App. 823

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 14 August 1991.Page 499